Product Description
Neurofilaments (NF) are approximately 10 nanometer intermediate filaments found in neurons. They are a major component of the neuronal cytoskeleton, and function primarily to provide structural support for the axon and to regulate the axon diameter. There are three major NF subunits, and the names given to these subunits are based upon the apparent molecular mass of the mammalian subunits on SDS-PAGE. The light or lowest NF (NF-L) runs at 68-70 kD. The medium or middle NF (NF-M) runs at about 145-160 kD, and the heavy or highest NF (NF-H) runs at 200-220 kD. However, the actual molecular weight of these proteins is considerably lower due to the highly charged C-terminal regions of the molecules. The level of NF gene expression correlates with the axonal diameter, which controls how fast electrical signals travel down the axon. Mutant mice with NF abnormalities have phenotypes resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. NF immunostaining is common in diagnostic neuropathology. It is useful for differentiating neurons (positive for NF) from the glia (negative for NF).
25microl
Verified Reactivity: Human, Mouse, Rat
Antibody Type: Monoclonal
Host Species: Mouse
Formulation: Phosphate-buffered solution (no preservatives or carrier proteins).
Preparation: The antibody was purified by affinity chromatography.
Concentration: 1 mg/ml
Storage & Handling: This antibody should be handled aseptically as it is free of preservatives such as Sodium Azide. Store this antibody undiluted between 2°C and 8°C. Please note the storage condition for this antibody has been changed from -20°C to between 2°C and 8°C. You can also check the vial label or CoA to find the proper storage conditions.
Application: IHC-P - Quality tested WB - Verified Array Tomography, ICC - Reported in the literature, not verified in house SB - Community verified
Recommended Usage: Each lot of this antibody is quality control tested by formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded immunohistochemical staining. For immunohistochemistry, a concentration range of 1.0 - 5.0 µg/ml is suggested. For Western blotting, the suggested use of this reagent is 1.0 - 5.0 µg per ml. It is recommended that the reagent be titrated for optimal performance for each application.
Application Notes: Additional reported applications (for the relevant formats) include Western blotting6, immunohistochemistry4,5, immunocytochemistry1,2,3, 7, array tomography8. Cross-reactivity to monkey tissue has been Reported in the literature, not verified in house4. This antibody reacts with a nonphosphorylated epitope in neurofilament H of most mammalian species. The reaction is masked when the epitope is phosphorylated. The staining of isolated neurofilament preparations is greatly intensified upon dephosphorylation. Immunocytochemically, SMI 32 visualizes neuronal cell bodies, dendrites, and some thick axons in the central and peripheral nervous systems. However, thin axons are not revealed. Other cells and tissues are unreactive. The antibody distinguishes three subdivisions of the macaque precentral motor cortex. The greater size of the left versus the right superior temporal lobe was found to be due to increased axonal myelination and not due to increased number of glial cells or SMI 32-enumerated neurons, suggesting that the specialization for language in the left temporal lobe is related to increased speed of signal transmission. In cultures of murine cortex, SMI 32 labels a neuronal population with enhanced vulnerability to kainate toxicity most of which are GABAergic and reveal kainate-activated Ca2+ uptake.
Additional Product Notes: This product has been verified for IHC-P (Immunohistochemistry - formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues) on the NanoString GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiler. The GeoMx® enables researchers to perform spatial analysis of protein and RNA targets in FFPE and fresh frozen human and mouse samples. For more information about our spatial biology products and the GeoMx® platform, please visit our spatial biology page.
Application References(PubMed link indicates BioLegend citation): Chang Q, Martin LJ. 2011. J. Neurosci., 31:2815-27. (ICC) PubMed Stevens HE, et al. 2010. J. Neurosci. 30:5590-602. (ICC) PubMed Kiryu-Seo S, et al. 2010. J. Neurosci. 30:6658-66. (ICC) PubMed Redondo J, et al. 2015. Brain Pathol. 25(6):692. (IHC-P) PubMed Feng L, et al. 2017. eNeuro. 4(1): 0331-16.2016. (IHC-P) PubMed Feng L, et al. 2014. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 54(2): 1106–1117. (IHC-P) PubMed Theotokis, et al. 2016. J. Neuroinflammation 13(1):265 (IHC-P) Bennett, et al. 2015. J. Neurosci. Methods 245:25-36 (Array Tomography) Petzold A, et al. 2011. Brain 134:464. (WB) PubMed
Product Citations: Stevens H, et al. 2010. J Neurosci. 30:5590-5602. PubMed Cignarella F et al. 2018. Cell metabolism. 27(6):1222-1235 . PubMed Zhou Y, et al. 2019. J Clin Invest. 130:1756. PubMed Abernathy DG et al. 2017. Cell stem cell. 21(3):332-348 . PubMed Zhang LY, et al. 2020. Theranostics. 0.468055556. PubMed Beckman D, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 41:111573. PubMed Metzner K, et al. 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:965382. PubMed Matsuda K, et al. 2022. Cereb Cortex Commun. 3:tgac046. PubMed Pinton L, et al. 2023. Nat Protoc. 18:1337. PubMed Jia J, et al. 2023. Cell Death Dis. 14:156. PubMed Castellanos-Montiel MJ, et al. 2023. Cells. 12:. PubMed Pestronk A, et al. 2023. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 49:e12898. PubMed Schmitt LI, et al. 2023. Acta Neuropathol. 145:611. PubMed Zahaf A, et al. 2023. Nat Commun. 14:1592. PubMed Hazra R, et al. 2023. Biomedicines. 11:. PubMed Chen TH, et al. 2023. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 32:144. PubMed Fiedler T, et al. 2023. J Neuroinflammation. 20:100. PubMed Del Bondio A, et al. 2023. JCI Insight. 8:. PubMed Samtani G, et al. 2023. Front Cell Neurosci. 17:1169786. PubMed Abdelwahab T, et al. 2023. iScience. 26:106698. PubMed Castelli LM, et al. 2021. Mol Neurodegener. 16:53. PubMed Tsolias A, et al. 2022. Front Neural Circuits. 15:795325. PubMed Munot P, et al. 2021. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. Online ahead of print. PubMed Hodgetts SI, et al. 2022. Neural Regen Res. 17:1376. PubMed Tan H, et al. 2022. J Comp Neurol. 530:1276. PubMed Gao J, et al. 2022. J Comp Neurol. 530:1494. PubMed McDonald AJ, et al. 2022. Brain Res. 1777:147767. PubMed Southam K, et al. 2022. J Physiol. 600:1611. PubMed Riechers SP, et al. 2022. Mol Metab. 60:101468. PubMed Caval-Holme FS, et al. 2022. J Neurosci. 42:4101. PubMed Kowal TJ, et al. 2022. J Comp Neurol. 530:2176. PubMed Ballester-Rosado CJ, et al. 2022. Ann Neurol. 92:45. PubMed Cunningham ME 2022. Experimental Neurology. 355:114127. PubMed Weil T, et al. 2022. Sci Adv. 8:eabn3567. PubMed Gaja-Capdevila N, et al. 2022. Int J Mol Sci. 23: . PubMed Januel C, et al. 2022. Cell Mol Life Sci. 79:441. PubMed Ma C, et al. 2022. J Leukoc Biol. 112:1387. PubMed Rosas Almanza J, et al. 2022. J Neurosci Res. 100:2213. PubMed Kapar O, et al. 2022. Neurosurg Focus. 53:E6. PubMed Gallego-Ortega A, et al. 2022. Front Neuroanat. 16:1054849. PubMed Zhang Y, et al. 2022. Front Cell Neurosci. 16:1069617. PubMed Kumar MS, et al. 2022. Int J Mol Sci. 23: . PubMed Tsitsipatis D, et al. 2022. Aging (Albany NY). 14:9832. PubMed Montilla A, et al. 2023. Cell Death Dis. 14:16. PubMed Li Z, et al. 2023. J Neuroinflammation. 20:16. PubMed Kapell H, et al. 2023. J Clin Invest. :. PubMed Zhang S, et al. 2022. Neuron. 110:992. PubMed Pellegatta M, et al. 2022. J Neurosci. 42:2433. PubMed Hagemann C, et al. 2022. Adv Healthc Mater. 11:e2101817. PubMed Zhu PP, et al. 2022. Hum Mol Genet. 31:2779. PubMed Rosenkranz SC, et al. 2021. eLife. 10:00. PubMed Cocozza G, et al. 2018. Brain Behav Immun. 73:584. PubMed Penndorf D et al. 2017. PloS one. 12(8):e0183684 . PubMed Ruff T, et al. 2021. Front Mol Neurosci. 14:790466. PubMed Bakken TE, et al. 2021. Nature. 598:111. PubMed Li X, et al. 2017. Mol Ther. 25(1):140-152. PubMed Atkinson R, et al. 2021. Dis Model Mech. 14:dmm047548. PubMed Sherafat A, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:2265. PubMed Manivasagam S, et al. 2022. J Immunol. 208:1341. PubMed Leo M, et al. 2022. Cells. 11:. PubMed Mahajan KR, et al. 2020. Ann Neurol. 88:81. PubMed Mikhalkin A, et al. 2020. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 529(7):1430-1441. PubMed Yoo M, Kim T 2016. Sci Rep. 6:28548. PubMed Trikamji B, et al. 2021. Muscle Nerve. 63:506. PubMed Ding B, et al. 2021. J Neurosci. 41:2024. PubMed Shi L, et al. 2021. Immunity. . PubMed Corsini S, et al. 2017. Cell Death Dis. 10.1038/cddis.2017.232. PubMed Wong R, et al. 2019. Brain Behav Immun. 76:126. PubMed Zhang Q, et al. 2019. PLoS Biol. 17:e3000330. PubMed Drohomyrecky PC, et al. 2019. J Immunol. 203:2588. PubMed Gaja-Capdevila N, et al. 2021. Front Pharmacol. 12:780588. PubMed Sainio MT, et al. 2022. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9:820105. PubMed Prukop T, et al. 2020. J Neurosci Res. 1933:98. PubMed Brodie-Kommit J, et al. 2021. Science Advances. 7(11):. PubMed Saba L, et al. 2016. Cereb Cortex. 26: 1512-1528. PubMed Li S, et al. 2016. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113: 1937 - 1942. PubMed Iida M, et al. 2019. Nat Commun. 10:4262. PubMed Doust YV, et al. 2021. Front Neurol. 12:722526. PubMed Utagawa EC, et al. 2022. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 10:86. PubMed Shi X, et al. 2021. Nat Commun. 12:6943. PubMed Calvo-Barreiro L, et al. 2021. Neurotherapeutics. . PubMed Merkulyeva N, et al. 2021. Neuroscience Letters. 762:136165. PubMed Reinhard K, et al. 2020. eLife. 8:e50697.. PubMed Honig MG, et al. 2021. Front Neurosci. 15:701317. PubMed , et al. 2021. Nature. 598:151. PubMed Kondo T, et al. 2022. Front Cell Neurosci. 16:858562. PubMed Harley J, et al. 2021. Brain Commun. 3:fcab166. PubMed Candadai AA, et al. 2021. PLoS One. e0247901:16. PubMed Ho R, et al. 2020. Cell Systems. 12(2):159-175.e9. PubMed Rizzo F, et al. 2016. Hum Mol Genet. 10.1093/hmg/ddw258. PubMed örner S, et al. 2016. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 10.1093/jnen/nlw003. PubMed Laug D, et al. 2019. J Clin Invest. 129:4408. PubMed Takakura K, et al. 2017. Heliyon. 3:e00462. PubMed Tung YT et al. 2019. Cell Stem Cell. 25(2):193-209 . PubMed Ondatje BN, et al. 2022. Lab Chip. 22:4246. PubMed Sharf T, et al. 2022. Nat Commun. 13:4403. PubMed Mavlyutov TA, et al. 2022. Cell Biosci. 12:72. PubMed Chen D, et al. 2022. J Neuroinflammation. 19:112. PubMed Clark CM, et al. 2021. Brain Sci. 11:. PubMed Simone R, et al. 2021. Nature. 594:117. PubMed Ou Y, et al. 2016. J Neurosci. 36: 9240 - 9252. PubMed Himmelein S, et al. 2017. J Virol. 10.1128/JVI.00331-17. PubMed Miguel JC, et al. 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 645334:13. PubMed Yi‐Lan Weng et al. 2018. Neuron. 97(2):313-325 . PubMed McLeod VM et al. 2019. Br J Pharmacol. 176(13):2111-2130 . PubMed Schirmer L, et al. 2019. Nature. 573:75. PubMed Yang C, et al. 2020. Neuron. 105:276. PubMed Abo-Rady M, et al. 2020. Stem Cell Reports. 14:390. PubMed Risner ML, et al. 2022. Mol Neurobiol. 59:1366. PubMed Yu M, et al. 2022. Front Neurol. 13:903565. PubMed Jiang D, et al. 2019. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 528(5):729-755. PubMed Azeez I, et al. 2016. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 75: 843 - 854. PubMed Donkels C, et al. 2016. Cereb Cortex. 10.1093/cercor/bhv346. PubMed Saraf MP et al. 2019. The Journal of comparative neurology. 527(15):2599-2611 . PubMed Ben Haim L, et al. 2021. Glia. 69:2812. PubMed van der Heijden ME, et al. 2021. J Physiol. 599:2037. PubMed Petrozziello T, et al. 2017. Cell Death Differ. 10.1038/cdd.2016.154. PubMed Chavali M, et al. 2020. Neuron. . PubMed Kinoshita H, et al. 2019. Sci Rep. 9:11519. PubMed Groh J, et al. 2021. Brain Commun. 3:fcab047. PubMed Lanz T, et al. 2017. Sci Rep. 7:41271. PubMed Brambilla L, et al. 2016. Hum Mol Genet. 10.1093/hmg/ddw161. PubMed Ebert T 2016. Hum Mol Genet. 25: 514 - 523. PubMed Roboon J, et al. 2019. Front Cell Neurosci. 13:258. PubMed Okigawa S, et al. 2021. J Comp Neurol. 529:2099. PubMed Parisi C, et al. 2016. Cell Death Differ. 23:531-541. PubMed Wagener R, et al. 2016. Cereb Cortex. 26: 820 - 837. PubMed Ho R, et al. 2016. Nat Neurosci. 10.1038/nn.4345. PubMed Hughes RO, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 34(1):108588. PubMed Ito K, et al. 2018. Sci Rep. 33:1052. PubMed Saraf MP et al. 2018. The Journal of comparative neurology. 527(3):625-639 . PubMed Hirono M, et al. 2018. J Neurosci. 38:6130. PubMed Reinehr S, et al. 2019. Int J Mol Sci. 2.613194444. PubMed Tan H, et al. 2019. Cell Death Differ. 27:1369. PubMed van der Heijden ME, et al. 2021. Elife. 10:. PubMed Wolf C, et al. 2022. Commun Biol. 5:541. PubMed Puller C, et al. 2020. J Neurosci. 40:1302. PubMed Casanovas A, et al. 2017. Sci Rep. 7:40155. PubMed Berry R, et al. 2015. PLoS One. 10: 0144341. PubMed Wang H, et al. 2015. Sci Rep. 5: 17383. PubMed Korzhevskii DE, et al. 2017. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 117:50. PubMed Dyer M, et al. 2019. Front Aging Neurosci. 11:68. PubMed Larson VA et al. 2018. eLife. 7 pii: e34829. PubMed Kelley KW et al. 2018. Neuron. 98(2):306-319 . PubMed Martin Q 2011. J Neurosci. 31:2815-2827. PubMed Petzold A, et al. 2011. Brain. 134:464-483. PubMed Redondo J, et al. 2015. Brain Pathol. 25:692-700. PubMed Faustino Martins JM, et al. 2020. Cell Stem Cell. 172:26. PubMed Miao W, et al. 2020. J Immunol. 1486:204. PubMed Fouda AY, et al. 2020. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 51:61. PubMed De Pace R, et al. 2018. PLoS Genet. 8:6458. PubMed Jiang LL, et al. 2019. J Clin Invest. 130. PubMed Nelke A, et al. 2022. Front Pharmacol. 12:773925. PubMed Thiry L, et al. 2022. ASN Neuro. 14:17590914211073381. PubMed Whye D, et al. 2022. Curr Protoc. 2:e568. PubMed Cuadrado E et al. 2019. Cell reports. 26(7):1718-1726 . PubMed Maruyama T, et al. 2018. Cell Death Dis. 12:146. PubMed Pelisch N, et al. 2021. Eneuro. 8:. PubMed Swanson OK, et al. 2021. Eneuro. 8:. PubMed Alpár A, et al. 2018. EMBO J. 37:. PubMed Alcover-Sanchez B, et al. 2021. Glia. 69:619. PubMed Wang F, et al. 2021. Current Biology. 31(11):2263-2273.e3. PubMed Bukreeva I, et al. 2017. Sci Rep. 7:41054. PubMed Feng L, et al. 2017. eNeuro. 4(1). PubMed MacNair L, et al. 2016. Brain. 139: 86 - 100. PubMed Sen T, et al. 2020. J Neurosci. 40:424. PubMed Litvina EY et al. 2017. Neuron. 96(2):330-338 . PubMed Turner M, et al. 2015. J Neuroimmunol. 285: 4-12. PubMed Pagliarini V, et al. 2015. J Cell Biol. 211: 77 - 90. PubMed Kiryu-Seo S, et al. 2010. J Neurosci. 30:6658-6666. PubMed Luna G, et al. 2016. Exp Eye Res. 150: 4-21. PubMed Roboon J, et al. 2021. Journal of Neurochemistry. . PubMed Eixarch H, et al. 2020. Neurotherapeutics. 17:1988. PubMed Wood KC et al. 2017. PloS one. 12(1):e0170264 . PubMed Abbas Farishta R, et al. 2021. Cereb Cortex Commun. 1:tgaa030. PubMed Richard P, et al. 2020. Autophagy. :1. PubMed Doroshenko ER, et al. 2021. Front Immunol. 570425:12. PubMed Wegscheid ML, et al. 2021. Cell Reports. 36(1):109315. PubMed Salapa HE, et al. 2019. Journal of Neuroscience Research. 98:704. PubMed Sepehrimanesh M, et al. 2020. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 319(4):C771-C780. PubMed Lv Q, et al. 2021. Cereb Cortex. 31:341. PubMed Griggs WS et al. 2017. Frontiers in neuroanatomy. 0.531944444 . PubMed Krieger B, et al. 2017. PLoS One. 12:e0180091. PubMed Granatiero V, et al. 2021. Autophagy. 17:4029. PubMed Ryan BJ, et al. 2021. J Neurosci. 41:3731. PubMed Khandker L, et al. 2022. Cell Rep. 38:110423. PubMed Niu F, et al. 2022. Elife. 11:. PubMed Henschke JU, et al. 2021. Cell Calcium. 96:102390. PubMed
RRID: AB_2715852 (BioLegend Cat. No. 801702) AB_2564642 (BioLegend Cat. No. 801701)
Structure: Neurofilament H has an apparent molecular mass of 200-220 kD.
Distribution: Tissue distribution: CNS, peripheral nerves and glandular cells of the prostate Cellular distribution: Cytoskeleton, nucleus, cytosol, and mitochondrion
Function: NF-H Neurofilaments are the major components of the neuronal cytoskeleton. They provide axonal support and regulate axon diameter. Phosphorylation of NF-H results in the formation of interfilament cross bridges that are important in the maintenance of axonal caliber.
Receptors: Phosphorylation seems to play a major role in the functioning of the larger neurofilament polypeptides (NF-M and NF-H), the levels of phosphorylation result in changes to the neurofilament function.
Cell Type: Mature Neurons
Biology Area: Cell Biology, Neuroscience, Neuroscience Cell Markers
Molecular Family: Intermediate Filaments, Phospho-Proteins
Antigen References: Turner M, et al. 2015. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 285: 4. PubMed Pagliarini V, et al. 2015. J. Cell Biol.. 211: 77. PubMed Petzold A, et al. 2011. Brain 134. (WB) PubMed Yuan A, et al. 2016. Brain Res Bull 126(3): 334. Parlakian A, et al. 2016. Rev Neurol. 172(10): 607. Li D, et al. 2016. Front Aging Neurosci. 8: 290. Costa J, et al. 2016. Clin Chim Acta. 455: 7. Lad SP, et al. 2010. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 21(1): 30.
Gene ID: 4744
UniProt: View information about Neurofilament H on UniProt.org
Clone: SMI 32
Regulatory Status: RUO
Other Names: Neurofilament heavy polypeptide, NF-H, 200 kD neurofilament protein, neurofilament triplet H protein
Previously: Covance Catalog# SMI-32P
Isotype: Mouse IgG1
Q: If an antibody clone has been previously successfully used in IBEX in one fluorescent format, will other antibody formats work as well?
A: It’s likely that other fluorophore conjugates to the same antibody clone will also be compatible with IBEX using the same sample fixation procedure. Ultimately a directly conjugated antibody’s utility in fluorescent imaging and IBEX may be specific to the sample and microscope being used in the experiment. Some antibody clone conjugates may perform better than others due to performance differences in non-specific binding, fluorophore brightness, and other biochemical properties unique to that conjugate.
Q: Will antibodies my lab is already using for fluorescent or chromogenic IHC work in IBEX?
A: Fundamentally, IBEX as a technique that works much in the same way as single antibody panels or single marker IF/IHC. If you’re already successfully using an antibody clone on a sample of interest, it is likely that clone will have utility in IBEX. It is expected some optimization and testing of different antibody fluorophore conjugates will be required to find a suitable format; however, legacy microscopy techniques like chromogenic IHC on fixed or frozen tissue is an excellent place to start looking for useful antibodies.
Q: Are other fluorophores compatible with IBEX?
A: Over 18 fluorescent formats have been screened for use in IBEX, however, it is likely that other fluorophores are able to be rapidly bleached in IBEX. If a fluorophore format is already suitable for your imaging platform it can be tested for compatibility in IBEX.
Q: The same antibody works in one tissue type but not another. What is happening?
A: Differences in tissue properties may impact both the ability of an antibody to bind its target specifically and impact the ability of a specific fluorophore conjugate to overcome the background fluorescent signal in a given tissue. Secondary stains, as well as testing multiple fluorescent conjugates of the same clone, may help to troubleshoot challenging targets or tissues. Using a reference control tissue may also give confidence in the specificity of your staining.
Q: How can I be sure the staining I’m seeing in my tissue is real?
A: In general, best practices for validating an antibody in traditional chromogenic or fluorescent IHC are applicable to IBEX. Please reference the Nature Methods review on antibody based multiplexed imaging for resources on validating antibodies for IBEX.
Order Guidelines
1. Price & Stock Available on Request. Click to send email to: service@iright.com
2. Please DO NOT make payment before confirmation.
3. Minimum order value of $1,000 USD required.
Collaboration
Tony Tang
Email: Tony.Tang@iright.com
Mobile/WhatsApp/Wechat: +86-17717886924